Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current

To: Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost>
Subject: Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
From: Matt Thomas <matt%3am-software.com@localhost>
Date: Sat, 26 Oct 2013 11:10:52 -0700

On Oct 26, 2013, at 10:54 AM, Izumi Tsutsui <tsutsui%ceres.dti.ne.jp@localhost> 
wrote:

>>> By static MACHINE_ARCH, or dynamic sysctl(3)?
>>> If dynamic sysctl(3) is prefered, which node?
>> 
>> hw.machine_arch
>> 
>> which has been defined for a long long time.
> 
> Yes, defined before sf vs hf issue arised, and
> you have changed the definition (i.e. make it dynamic)
> without public discussion.  That's the problem.

It was already dynamic (it changes for compat_netbsd32).

Follow-Ups:
- Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
  - From: Alistair Crooks
- Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui

References:
- Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
  - From: Izumi Tsutsui

Prev by Date: Re: How to hot swap an SCA SCSI disk with NetBSD
Next by Date: Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Previous by Thread: Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Next by Thread: Re: MACHINE_ARCH on NetBSD/evbearmv6hf-el current
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index