Re: Replace VI_INACT*

To: "J. Hannken-Illjes" <hannken%eis.cs.tu-bs.de@localhost>
Subject: Re: Replace VI_INACT*
From: David Holland <dholland-tech%netbsd.org@localhost>
Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2013 16:48:20 +0000

On Tue, Nov 19, 2013 at 11:57:14AM +0100, J. Hannken-Illjes wrote:
 > The attached diff will:
 > 
 > Replace VI_INACTNOW and VI_INACTREDO with a new flag VI_CHANGING that gets
 > set while a vnode changes state from active to inactive or from active
 > or inactive to clean and protects "vclean(); vrelel()" and "vrelel()"
 > against "vget()".
 > 
 > Comments or objections anyone?

I don't see any obvious problems and it looks like a step forward...

-- 
David A. Holland
dholland%netbsd.org@localhost

References:
- Replace VI_INACT*
  - From: J. Hannken-Illjes

Prev by Date: Re: A Library for Converting Data to and from C Structs for Lua
Next by Date: Re: in which we present an ugly hack to make sys/queue.h CIRCLEQ work
Previous by Thread: Replace VI_INACT*
Next by Thread: ~5 percent kernel performance loss in the last 3 weeks
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index