Re: Vnode API change: add global vnode cache

[Ilia Zykov <netbsd%izyk.ru@localhost>]

On 01.05.2014 22:02, David Holland wrote:
>  > > I don't think that's necessary. For vnodes belonging to virtual
>  > > objects, there's very little to be gained by counting them under
>  > > maxvnodes or cycling them "out of memory". The actual underlying
>  > > objects can't go away and the vnode itself is just a fairly small
>  > > administrative structure.

Maybe it is not to place.
procfs' objects can go away.

>  >
>  > Sounds reasonable -- but we are not at a point to make this decision.
> 
> I think we are; we aren't at the point to *do* it, but knowing more or
> less where we want to go I think we can make the design decision.