Re: Does "options P1003_1B_SEMAPHORE" still exist?

[Joerg Sonnenberger <joerg%britannica.bec.de@localhost>]

On Tue, May 06, 2014 at 07:34:44PM +0200, Matthias Drochner wrote:
> 
> On Tue, 6 May 2014 10:51:43 -0400
> Matthew Mondor <mm_lists%pulsar-zone.net@localhost> wrote:
> > I have the impression that those syscalls should all be documented in
> > a section 2 manual page instead (kern/37427).
> 
> As has been mentioned before, the (kernel) semaphore implementation
> in -current doesn't work well.

I haven't seen any such mentioning. PR?

Joerg