tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
a parallel operation problem about softint(9)
Hi,
I found a parallel operation problem between softint_execute()
and softint_disestablish().
The following single CPU operation of softint(9) is ok.
- softint_establish()
- set function, argument, and so on to the appropriate softint_t
- softint_schedule()
- the softhand_t is set SOFTINT_PENDING flag
- the softhand_t is inserted to si->si_q queue
- wait for softint is scheduled
- softint_execute()
- the softhand_t is removed form si->si_q queue
- the softhand_t is unset SOFTINT_PENDING flag
- the softhand_t is set SOFTINT_ACTIVE flag
- do softint handler of the softhand_t
- the softhand_t is unset SOFTINT_ACTIVE flag
- softint_disestablish()
- wait until softhand_t's SOFTINT_ACTIVE of all CPUs is clear
- unset function of the softint_t
In contrast, the following parallel operation causes panic.
(0) softint handler "handler A" is established
(1) CPU#X do softint_schedule() for "handler A"
- the softhand_t is set SOFTINT_PENDING flag
- the softhand_t is NOT set SOFTINT_ACTIVE flag yet
(2) CPU#X begin other H/W interrupt processing
(3) CPU#Y do softint_disestablish() for "handler A"
- wait until softhand_t's SOFTINT_ACTIVE of all CPUs is clear
- the softhand_t is set not SOFTINT_ACTIVE but SOFTINT_PENDING,
so CPU#Y does not wait
- unset function of "handler A"
(4) CPU#X do softint_execute()
- the function of "handler A" is already clear, so panic
I think softint_disestablish should wait not only SOFTINT_ACTIVE
but also SOFTINT_PENDING flag, that is, the following patch is
required
====================
--- a/sys/kern/kern_softint.c
+++ b/sys/kern/kern_softint.c
@@ -443,7 +443,7 @@ softint_disestablish(void *arg)
flags |= sh->sh_flags;
}
/* Inactive on all CPUs? */
- if ((flags & SOFTINT_ACTIVE) == 0) {
+ if ((flags & (SOFTINT_PENDING | SOFTINT_ACTIVE)) == 0) {
break;
}
/* Oops, still active. Wait for it to clear. */
====================
Under my environment, this patch fixes above panic, and does not cause
new problems.
Could you comment this patch?
Thanks,
--
//////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
Internet Initiative Japan Inc.
Device Engineering Section,
Core Product Development Department,
Product Division,
Technology Unit
Kengo NAKAHARA <k-nakahara%iij.ad.jp@localhost>
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index