Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?

To: paul%whooppee.com@localhost, Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik%gmail.com@localhost>
Subject: Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
From: Wolfgang Solfrank <Wolfgang%Solfrank.net@localhost>
Date: Sat, 9 Jan 2016 10:42:07 +0100

Hi,

We all agree that filemon(4) is an ugly hack.  It probably should never
have gotten committed.  But it is there now, and there are a (very) few
use-cases.  So we don't want to remove it without having a replacement
implementation.


Well, can you explain?  Why would we not want to remove it and be done
with that nonsense?

Ciao,
Wolfgang
--
Wolfgang%Solfrank.net@localhost				Wolfgang Solfrank

Follow-Ups:
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Paul Goyette

References:
- In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: David Holland
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Mateusz Guzik
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Paul Goyette
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Mateusz Guzik
- Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
  - From: Paul Goyette

Prev by Date: Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
Next by Date: Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
Previous by Thread: Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
Next by Thread: Re: In-kernel process exit hooks?
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index