Re: Potential new syscall

To: Mouse <mouse%Rodents-Montreal.ORG@localhost>, tech-kern%NetBSD.org@localhost
Subject: Re: Potential new syscall
From: Kamil Rytarowski <n54%gmx.com@localhost>
Date: Tue, 3 Apr 2018 18:29:08 +0200

On 03.04.2018 16:57, Mouse wrote:
>> =46rom the GDB protocol point of view,
> ...what does gdb have to do with it?  Did I miss something?
> 

We need to track forks and its variations. Just a note that from the
existing protocol point of view, we can handle this new syscall.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

References:
- Potential new syscall
  - From: Mouse
- Re: Potential new syscall
  - From: Robert Elz
- Re: Potential new syscall
  - From: Kamil Rytarowski
- Re: Potential new syscall
  - From: Mouse

Prev by Date: Re: Potential new syscall
Next by Date: Is there a current known getrusage() problem (amd64)
Previous by Thread: Re: Potential new syscall
Next by Thread: Re: Potential new syscall
Indexes:

Home | Main Index | Thread Index | Old Index