tech-kern archive
[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index][Old Index]
Re: NetBSD 8.0/amd64+ bhyve (FreeBSD 12)+xhci = SIGSEGV
On Tue, Sep 25, 2018 at 11:02 PM Oleg Ginzburg <olevole%olevole.ru@localhost> wrote:
>
> Hello. NetBSD works fine in bhyve, except for the case when the bhyve
> emulates eXtensible Host Controller Interface (xHCI) USB controller. (
> -s 30,xhci,tablet )
> Perhaps SIGSEGV of bhyve is caused by the abnormal behavior of xhci on
> the NetBSD guest, so I decided to write both mailing lists.
>
> LLDB output upon bhyve crash (guest screen: https://pasteboard.co/HFAqTOk.png ):
>
> https://github.com/freebsd/freebsd/blob/ebeb3285f598d6c1214c49598c951493d09e1067/usr.sbin/bhyve/pci_xhci.c#L735
>
> Process 57083 stopped
> * thread #20, name = 'vcpu 0', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: invalid
> address (fault address: 0x0)
> frame #0: 0x00000000002587d8
> bhyve`pci_xhci_insert_event(sc=0x00000008010a5100,
> evtrb=0x00007fffddbeba78, do_intr=0) at pci_xhci.c:735
> 732 rts = &sc->rtsregs;
> 733
> 734 erdp = rts->intrreg.erdp & ~0xF;
> -> 735 erdp_idx = (erdp -
> rts->erstba_p[rts->er_deq_seg].qwEvrsTablePtr) /
> 736 sizeof(struct xhci_trb);
> 737
> 738 DPRINTF(("pci_xhci: insert event 0[%lx] 2[%x] 3[%x]\r\n"
> (lldb) frame variable erdp_idx
> (int) erdp_idx = 0
>
>
> in all likelihood, the problem in the rts->erstba_p structure because
> when I commenting 735 line ( erdp_idx is used only in DPRINTF debug
> output ) the next stop when working with this structure again, e.g:
>
> Process 58354 stopped
> * thread #20, name = 'vcpu 0', stop reason = signal SIGSEGV: invalid
> address (fault address: 0x8)
> frame #0: 0x0000000000258881
> bhyve`pci_xhci_insert_event(sc=0x00000008010a5100,
> evtrb=0x00007fffddbeba78, do_intr=0) at pci_xhci.c:750
> 747 evtrbptr = &rts->erst_p[rts->er_enq_idx];
> 748
> 749 /* TODO: multi-segment table */
> -> 750 if (rts->er_events_cnt >= rts->erstba_p->dwEvrsTableSize) {
> 751 DPRINTF(("pci_xhci[%d] cannot insert event;
> ring full\r\n",
> 752 __LINE__));
> 753 err = XHCI_TRB_ERROR_EV_RING_FULL;
>
>
> What can I do to find out the reasons for this behavior? Thanks!
The bhyve initializes rts->erstba_p in pci_xhci_rtsregs_write() of
bhyve/pci_xhci.c
only when higher 32 bits of ERSTBA (ERSTBA_HI) is written.
The NetBSD writes only lower 32 bit of ERSTBA because the AC64 bit of
hccparams1 is not set on the bhyve.
I think rts->erstba_p of the bhyve is uninitialised for the NetBSD guest.
The bhyve should initialize rts->erstba_p when lower 32 bits of
ERSTBA is written, too.
Home |
Main Index |
Thread Index |
Old Index