Re: svr4, again

["Jonathan A. Kollasch" <jakllsch%kollasch.net@localhost>]

On Sat, Mar 09, 2019 at 11:28:05AM +0100, Maxime Villard wrote:
> Re-reading this thread - which was initially about SVR4 but which diverged in
> all directions -, I see there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULTRIX and
> COMPAT_OSF1, because these were of questionable utility, in addition to being
> clear dead wood (in terms of use case, commits in these areas, and ability to
> test changes).
> 
> Does anyone have anything to say?

Possibly, although I doubt they'll notice they want to say something in
this thread with the current Subject line...  I'd suggest starting a
new thread, possibly CCing port-pmax@ and port-alpha@ as relevant.

	Jonathan Kollasch