Re: svr4, again

[Christos Zoulas <christos%zoulas.com@localhost>]

Let's retire them.

christos

> On Mar 9, 2019, at 5:28 AM, Maxime Villard <max%m00nbsd.net@localhost> wrote:
> 
> Re-reading this thread - which was initially about SVR4 but which diverged in
> all directions -, I see there were talks about retiring COMPAT_ULTRIX and
> COMPAT_OSF1, because these were of questionable utility, in addition to being
> clear dead wood (in terms of use case, commits in these areas, and ability to
> test changes).
> 
> Does anyone have anything to say?