Re: "wireguard" implementation improperly merged and needs revert

[Thor Lancelot Simon <tls%panix.com@localhost>]

On Sat, Aug 22, 2020 at 08:35:39PM +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> 
> In its current form, there are implementation flaws and violations
> that I do not consider acceptable, and deploying this kind of thing is
> highly irresponsible and harmful to your users.

Can you please explain what these (heck, what even _one_ of these) are?

As far as I know the code was written following the published documentation.
That's how Internet protocol development works, is it not?

Thor