Re: [10.0_STABLE] Hard lock

[Rin Okuyama <rokuyama.rk%gmail.com@localhost>]

Hi,

On 2024/10/27 23:11, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> 	I haven't seen other locks with these three patches. Can you apply
> these patches to -10 branch ?

For three commits in your previous message:

On 2024/10/19 3:08, BERTRAND Joël wrote:
> (1/3) 
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2023/12/28/msg149090.html
> Use correct status value SCSI_BUSY (0x08) instead of XS_BUSY (7)...
>
> (2/3) 
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2024/08/24/msg153012.html
> Avoid race in timeout handling.
> Don't try to wake up CCB without connection (which led to a NULL pointer
> deref).
>
> (3/3) 
https://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2024/10/15/msg153958.html

only (3/3) (cprng_fast v.s. softint) has already been pullup'ed.

Michael, can I request iSCSI ones before 10.1 release?

Thanks,
rin