"Perry E. Metzger" <perry@piermont.com> writes:

> > Speaking of which: what happened with the SACK
> > implemention-in-progress which was mentioned a bunch a few months ago?
> 
> Dunno. Anyone need me to try digging it up?

The implementation or the reference?

Last I heard, it was done for 1.1, but needed some work and Mycroft didn't
like the way some things were done.

--Michael