Subject: Re: BOOTP support (change request)
To: None <dennis@jnx.com>
From: Gordon W. Ross <gwr@mc.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/21/1997 15:39:15
> X-Mailer: exmh version 1.6.9 8/22/96
> cc: tech-net@netbsd.org
> Mime-Version: 1.0
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
> Date: Wed, 21 May 1997 11:56:14 -0700
> From: Dennis Ferguson <dennis@jnx.com>
> Content-Length: 419
>
> > Can anyone see a problem with the above proposal?
> > Attached is a proposed change to implement this.
> > Comments?
>
> It's a nit but it would probably be better to avoid sending back, say,
> ICMP port unreachables when the interface is in this state.
>
> You could do this by setting M_BCAST on packets matching the magic
> case as an expedient, if exceedingly disgusting, way of achieving the
> desired result.
>
> Dennis Ferguson
Ahhh... Yes. There is also the issue of ARP requests that arrive
with either of the protocol (IP) addresses set to zero, which will
confuse in_arpinput() when the interface address is zero. i.e.:
# ifconfig ie0 0.0 up
duplicate IP address 00000000 sent from link address 00:00:1d:2d:ba:43
duplicate IP address 00000000 sent from link address 00:80:a3:04:7a:89
It looks like there is a little more work to be done before the
network stack can support the proposed new interface semantics.
I'll look into it some more. (Suggestions appreciated! 8^)
Gordon