>> [accepting multicast Ethernet addresses in arp replies]
> I'm still convinced it _should_ be forbidden, because of the DOS
> potential,

What DOS potential?  I can't see how you can use this as a DOS attack
in any situation where you couldn't equally well perform a DOS attack
by arp poisoning with nonexistent unicast Ether addresses....

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B