Subject: Re: export controls
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/28/1999 15:05:49
> I will soon be committing KAME IPv6/IPsec code into the tree.
> (IPv6 part will be superseded by unified-ipv6 when unified-ipv6
> becomes ready). One thing annoys me is IPsec part and US export
> control issues. I would like to know which part in the kernel
> is okay to go into base tree, and which part must be in
> crypto-{intl,us} tree.
Do you think it is (export-control-wise) safe to include
sys/netinet6/esp.h into syssrc, not to cryptosrc-intl? If we don't
include this into syssrc, sys/netinet6/Makefile needs some trick
(INCS+=esp.h must be controlled in some wacky way).
My impression is that it is technically safe, but I don't know what
the export control bureaucrats think.
KAME sys/netinet6/esp.h can be found at:
http://www2.kame.net/dev/cvsweb.cgi/sys/netinet6/Attic/esp.h?cvsroot=kame-netbsd
so please look at it and send me your comment.
itojun