In some email I received from Jason Thorpe, sie wrote:
> On Tue, 29 Jun 1999 01:48:19 +1000 (EST) 
>  Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au> wrote:
> 
>  > In lieu of there not being a flag for "listen" being supported by the
>  > xxx_usrreq function, would checking if PR_CONNREQUIRED or PR_WANTRCVD
>  > are set be appropriate for determining if EOPNOTSUPP should be returned ?
> 
> Why not add a flag?

Well, that can be done, sure.  But looking at what's there, it already seems
like PR_CONNREQUIRED supplies the same information as another flag saying
"listen/accept supported".  I guess the question is would using that flag
for that purpose be a misuse of it ?

Darren