>  ATM would need a way to specify both the VCI and VPI (often written as
>either VPI:VCI or the reverse--I can't remember!) but otherwise it could be
>a good way to specify PVCs.

	at this moment we can make pseudo interface (pvc[0-n]) for each of
	VCs by pvcsif(8), and configure VPI/VCI by using pvctxctl(8).
	(I could not run extensive check with NetBSD-current, but it worked
	with KAME/NetBSD not too long ago)

itojun