>> Well, I wouldn't mind you changing the code to use the wide output
>> only for inet6 case, not for inet4... :-)
>> (Itojun may have an opinion here, too...)

> okay I will.  is it okay for you guys to see different field width
> per address families?

That's what I'd prefer (and expect), yes, and if I end up implementing
it that's what I expect I'll do.

					der Mouse

			       mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
		     7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39  4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B