> > 	is it okay for you guys?  we are now testing this in kame tree and
> > 	is working fine.
>I think the best solution is to just change it to sockaddr_storage.

	i agree going to sockaddr_storage is the best solution.  however,
	there are many places where type of "ro_dst" is assumed to be
	sockaddr, like:
		struct sockaddr *sa;
		sa = &ro.ro_dst;
	so i just worried about more gratuitous diffs due to the type change
	and additional typecasts.

itojun