Subject: Re: more ratelimit issue
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: John Hawkinson <jhawk@MIT.EDU>
List: tech-net
Date: 07/27/2000 00:37:27
> I believe the right way (quick solution for 1.5) is the second one.
> we cannot really trust local traffic (local traffic does not fill
> network bandwidth, however, it still chews CPU time) so the first
> one will be ruled out. Is it okay if I make the following changes:
> - tcp_input to use ppsratelimit(9), instead of ratelimit(9)
> and also,
> - remove "loopback is okay" code from IPv4 ICMP error rate limitation.
That sounds reasonable to me.
--jhawk