Subject: Proxy ARP
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Abhishek Khandelwal <abhishek@impulsesoft.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/15/2000 02:17:39
Hi ,

Can anyone tell me how to add a Proxy ARP entry into the RP cache.

I am working on TCP/IP suite provided by ecos. It does not provides
utilities such as netstat and arp.  Tell me the way how Proxy ARP entry is
made by arp command

Abhishek

----- Original Message -----
From: Manuel Bouyer <bouyer@antioche.lip6.fr>
To: Jason R Thorpe <thorpej@zembu.com>; <tech-net@netbsd.org>
Sent: Tuesday, November 14, 2000 2:05 PM
Subject: Re: 802.1q hardware support


> On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 04:39:40PM -0800, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
> > On Mon, Nov 13, 2000 at 11:02:41PM +0100, Manuel Bouyer wrote:
> >
> >  > Note that M_VLAN1Q/mh_info can be used for the receive part as well,
> >  > to avoid calling vlan_input_tag() from the driver itself (will be
from
> >  > if_input).
> >
> > Yes, please.  Symmetry is good.  It also means you can eliminate
> > #if NVLAN from the ti driver.  It also means you can eliminte that
> > extra vlan_input_ifv() function, and replace it with a simple goto :-)
>
> I'm not sure this is a good idea; we'd have to test for M_VLAN1Q 2 times:
> one in ether_input and one in vlan_input. I don't know which one costs
more.
>
> >
> >  > Note that the lines in the patch below won't match for if_ti.c: to
get
> >  > hardware tagging to work I had to update the firmware, so I started
pulling
> >  > up changes from FreeBSD. This will give us support for the copper
variant
> >  > of the board (gigabit over cat5).
> >  >
> >  > Comments ? I'd like to commit this soon, so that I can start working
> >  > on hardware checksum (I'm sure someone would ask :)
> >
> > Besides my comments above and please put the info field in the pkthdr,
> > it looks good.
>
> Ok. I'll cook up a second patch with these changes.
>
> --
> Manuel Bouyer, LIP6, Universite Paris VI.           Manuel.Bouyer@lip6.fr
> --
>