Subject: Re: PMTUD blackhole detection
To: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <ignatios@cs.uni-bonn.de>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/02/2001 10:24:51
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, May 02, 2001 at 09:10:25AM +0900, itojun@iijlab.net wrote:
>=20
> >Cool. Is there some way that we could set a flag in the route,=20
> >rather than just having a per-connection flag? That way we only have
> >to pay the cost of the two timeouts once per black hole, rather
> >than once per connection...
>=20
> if you know that PMTUD is failing for particular paths, you should
> be able to set a lower path MTU value by using route(8) (use -mtu
> keyword).
I understand he wants to make this automatic?
-is
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i
iQEVAgUBOu/ETzCn4om+4LhpAQEUIwf+OadnlmWSjX+MPMe0zoGbahIPDsUnzF+k
F/hh+94Zn5QKzH4c7Ze8RNvLr24H7xgD6WN9pkdQFAYW5hD7LBbAAyZ+OBhSuAOm
o+IeRJOdOnw+mzdN5kVMVPHtL4re0nffeS2e0d1fhvmNuV6Xs1U4qIuY7V0Sov9v
1DXPLVjwh2sM2LinkiLdTTqMjga/u4zjcNkLvMBvvNfb9KE0qBJ7NAVQK1/GQvD4
3dMbCwNMtrLIEged9GZb0LQgeYol0ybyfTP10Iq3akncMAx+PyAIVoRjyc7drPm6
uBA/N6ETKX0+Rlp6pZUN4ripy58ozzn/u9mndKoUEQom9ayfuZ/1ew==
=8mT4
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Bn2rw/3z4jIqBvZU--