-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


>>>>> "der" == der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA> writes:
    der> One of the hosts in it is actually run by a friend of mine.  Since I
    der> don't run it (even though I basically trust the guy who does, or I
    der> wouldn't've set it up in the first place), I don't want it capable of
    der> sniffing the house LAN. Since I had a spare Ethernet card and I

  Just do routing.

    der> Now, the question is, how can I do this for IPv6?  If we assume I'm
    der> using (say) 0300::/96 on the house LAN, how can I get G to respond to
    der> neighbour sols for S's address as well as G's own?  Everything else,

  You'll never get a /96!
  The smallest you are likely ever have is a /48. (in particular, you get a /48 
for each IPv4 address that you own, see the 6to4 stuff).

  If you can fill it... well... I'm not sure I really want ever atom in my
house to be SNMP managemeable :-)

  it remains to be seen what ISPs that do dialup will do. Many are pushing
for them to give out /64s at a minimum.

]       ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine.           |  firewalls  [
]   Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON    |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another NetBSD/notebook using, kernel hacking, security guy");  [

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.3ia
Charset: latin1
Comment: Finger me for keys

iQCVAwUBPNHLF4qHRg3pndX9AQEGvAP/SNeHe9bWb6OXt2KQbUraRKhVHWxOgliq
hoUBcUZhXtcb3nQmouss36NWnKt+DXgVO2Gj8fDUqvEIJvIzDIbwiEo/nbXyi6YW
kk9YTuMy+/Bld41aOZKxSn/6yRuKyFX/xHdz0Z6eBuDdtqvpoIN7C/1A3AOQR8NE
SXK/uIuZ/l0=
=jFfY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----