Subject: Re: "proxy arp" for ipv6?
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: der Mouse <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/04/2002 22:42:49
>> I've actually got a /56 (assigned out of a friendly site's /48), of
>> which I'm using a /96, with the other 40 bits presently all 0.
> it is up to you, but i highly recommend you to use /64 for subnets,
> as all specs recommend.
What's the point of expanding the address space to 128 bits if you're
just going to throw half of them away?
> stateless autoconfiguration is possible only with /64,
What is that, and why would I want it?
> and fixed /64 boundary for subnet eases many of management hurdles.
Such as? I have trouble thinking of anything that outweighs having a
human-comprehensible correspondence between a machine's v6 address and
its v4 address.
/~\ The ASCII der Mouse
\ / Ribbon Campaign
X Against HTML mouse@rodents.montreal.qc.ca
/ \ Email! 7D C8 61 52 5D E7 2D 39 4E F1 31 3E E8 B3 27 4B