Subject: Re: thoughts on limiting connections to a socket
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Greg A. Woods <woods@weird.com>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/05/2002 01:45:24
[ On Wednesday, June 5, 2002 at 00:06:20 (+1000), Darren Reed wrote: ]
> Subject: thoughts on limiting connections to a socket
>
> Hmmm, the only real way this would make a difference is if the
> lookup to see if the n/host was being exceeded was done on behalf
> of the application listening (rather than the kernel processing
> the IP input queue). ie. if it doesn't get done on behalf of the
> listener then it may as well be done by ipf, right ?
>
> Comments ?
maybe TCP needs an equivalent of SMTP's "421 please come back later"
response so it can say I'm here, and I'm listening, but I'm too damn
busy right now....
--
Greg A. Woods
+1 416 218-0098; <gwoods@acm.org>; <g.a.woods@ieee.org>; <woods@robohack.ca>
Planix, Inc. <woods@planix.com>; VE3TCP; Secrets of the Weird <woods@weird.com>