--W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Thu, Nov 07, 2002 at 09:18:03AM +0100, Pavel Cahyna wrote:
> >=20
> > Well, not so much a bug as just an "incomplete" feature....
> >=20
> > Indeed the problem is because ntalk is a UDP service.
> >=20
> > The integrated TCP Wrappers support in inetd is only for TCP services
> > (and only for "external" TCP services too unless you recompile inetd
> > with -DLIBWRAP_INTERNAL).  UDP services are not protected (or logged
> > with '-l').  "wait" services aren't even wrapped as far as I can tell.
> >=20
>=20
> Thanks for the clarification. Shouldn't be tcpd provided until this gets
> implemented in inetd? Or at least, please mention this in inetd(8) and
> hosts_access(5). Should I send a PR about documentation bug?

Yes.
	-is

--W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.i

iQEVAgUBPco3GjCn4om+4LhpAQEgBwgAien7hgpQ2EU6rYIf6kgw9TNgYbor+s5j
7ognnAR3Bp4l2nQZXNiWfBc+FYQqIWCS85wiY79/G98LlWEYKM6jI7CZhaaFOzDs
vN67HePxtOgASob8ypc5yqjfsYck9wUFi/zrsDvHE+gMQ4tgwWgD/r721PTeFknm
1pTr7CqIOD3CYwV8dnqLtCLOBBda6rsXAP1OHlDCpGk9/kYem2I1ZUlLSqppPPyb
KFcl92jRJ1SYw8EBFjbQwEISYLyMFzTc/WlC1a1jm1BG5m2meh2UFHwB/1nqXCsN
eWeygecpwVLHonWZTswbloqXsWkrIy/zQ9VFtVozR9+IZrbN1tBPrg==
=emV5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--W5WqUoFLvi1M7tJE--