>	SIOCGIFCONF is way too hard to get right, that's the very reason why
>	we now have getifaddrs(3).  i'm all for the change.

i beg to differ.  i did "it", without knowing it was supposed to be
difficult, i have no doubt that you could "it", others have done "it"
in the past, and i'm sure others will do "it" in the future.

certainly, using getifaddrs(3) is "easier", but SIOCGIFCONF *not*
"hard".

that said, i'm not at all opposed to the change, but what i am opposed
to is the FUD about SIOCGIFCONF.

-- 
|-----< "CODE WARRIOR" >-----|
codewarrior@daemon.org             * "ah!  i see you have the internet
twofsonet@graffiti.com (Andrew Brown)                that goes *ping*!"
werdna@squooshy.com       * "information is power -- share the wealth."