At 08:17 PM 11/9/2002, Jason R Thorpe wrote:
>This patch is a big step towards cleaning up signed/unsigned comparison
>warnings related to mbuf usage.  Cleaning up these warnings is required
>for the upgrade to GCC 3.3, which is very picky about this sort of thing
>(as is our in-tree lint(1)).  And, well, if you think about it, it doesn't
>make any sense to have a -ve length mbuf :-)
>
>I would like a few other sets of eyes to look over this patch before
>I check it in.

Can you do two diffs?  One for ANSI'fication and the other for
the type change?


-- 
Matt Thomas               Internet:   matt@3am-software.com
3am Software Foundry      WWW URL:    http://www.3am-software.com/bio/matt/
Cupertino, CA             Disclaimer: I avow all knowledge of this message