Subject: Re: Non-IPSec Processing Point for ipf
To: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
From: Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/18/2003 17:26:44
On Thu, 17 Apr 2003, Michael Richardson wrote:
> 1) if you have IPsec, it doesn't matter what interface things arrive on.
> So, you can name the new "pseudo" interface, something like "ipsec"
It certainly does matter what interface things arrive on!
If I have two IPSec links, one to network A/24 and one to network B/24,
I need to block all source=A/24 packets that come in via the tunnel from
B, and all source=B/24 packets that come in via the tunnel from A, because
those packets are forged.
> (In any case, "noipsec" confuses me. I think you meant
> "after-ipsec-processing"?)
But "after-ipsec-processing" is *with* ipsec on the outbound direction
of an interface.
cjs
--
Curt Sampson <cjs@cynic.net> +81 90 7737 2974 http://www.netbsd.org
Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're all light. --XTC