Subject: Re: Non-IPSec Processing Point for ipf
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Michael Richardson <mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/18/2003 15:53:37
>>>>> "Andrew" == Andrew Brown <atatat@atatdot.net> writes:
Andrew> interesting. you are actually in a situation where you are using
Andrew> ipsec to obscure yet do not trust the other party? why waste
Andrew> time on
Andrew> ipsec? i assume from this, that ah would not help at all.
1) Trust is not binary.
2) I may trust party (a) differently than party (b), and I need to make
sure that they do not impersonate each other.
3) IPsec is not just about VPNs. Many applications of it terminate the
SA *in front* of the firewalling, not use IPsec to except the packets
from the firewall. This is what this thread is about.
] ON HUMILITY: to err is human. To moo, bovine. | firewalls [
] Michael Richardson, Sandelman Software Works, Ottawa, ON |net architect[
] mcr@sandelman.ottawa.on.ca http://www.sandelman.ottawa.on.ca/ |device driver[
] panic("Just another Debian GNU/Linux using, kernel hacking, security guy"); [