with inetd's debug printing routine, we have a part like
		wait:max=0.40
	which seems confusing.  i think it would be better to use
		wait.max=0.40
	or
		wait:max=0:40

	which one seems better?  if there's no preference i'd like to go for
	"wait.max" as traditional inetd does so.

itojun


Index: inetd.c
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvsroot/src/usr.sbin/inetd/inetd.c,v
retrieving revision 1.91
diff -u -r1.91 inetd.c
--- inetd.c	2003/04/22 07:46:46	1.91
+++ inetd.c	2003/04/28 02:56:51
@@ -2047,7 +2047,7 @@
 
 	if (isrpcservice(sep))
 		fprintf(stderr,
-		    "%s: %s rpcprog=%d, rpcvers = %d/%d, proto=%s, wait:max=%d.%d, user:group=%s:%s builtin=%lx server=%s"
+		    "%s: %s rpcprog=%d, rpcvers = %d/%d, proto=%s, wait.max=%d.%d, user:group=%s:%s builtin=%lx server=%s"
 #ifdef IPSEC
 		    " policy=\"%s\""
 #endif
@@ -2062,7 +2062,7 @@
 		    );
 	else
 		fprintf(stderr,
-		    "%s: %s proto=%s%s, wait:max=%d.%d, user:group=%s:%s builtin=%lx server=%s"
+		    "%s: %s proto=%s%s, wait.max=%d.%d, user:group=%s:%s builtin=%lx server=%s"
 #ifdef IPSEC
 		    " policy=%s"
 #endif