Subject: Re: Try again, itojun, patches need more work.
To: Darren Reed <avalon@caligula.anu.edu.au>
From: None <itojun@iijlab.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 06/30/2003 13:51:28
>> tagnames needs to be reference-counted. i.e. whenever there are
>> filtering rules that use certain tagname, you want a consistent value.
>
>Oh sure, I think you've misunderstood my criticism here.
if you have comments to pf code itself, talk to pf people via
tech@openbsd or misc@openbsd (don't shoot the messenger).
>1. There should be no need for pftag_purge(), pftag_unref() should do
> all the work.
i hope so, but things can go wrong so it's good to have cleanup
function like this.
>2. pftag_tag2tagname() isn't used (dead function?)
it is used in openbsd bridge code as well as kame ipsec-and-pf code.
itojun