> > Note also, that the array that stores the results should be as big as
> > the range of the result, so while this should work for 20 bit numbers
> 
> I had noticed (and changed) the array size...
>  
> > I just tried the 20 bit generator, and it's down to a 38 call gap
> > between identical ids after 39364490 calls.  Obviously(?) the greater
> > range is helping here, but it still has the same basic flaw.
> 
> Apply the following:

	ru_a and ru_b setup are corrected for 16bit and 20bit case.  tnx.

itojun