Subject: Re: kernel ip_randomid() and libc randomid(3) still "broken"
To: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
List: tech-net
Date: 11/26/2003 14:42:09
In message <20031126213900.5F35B96@coconut.itojun.org>,
Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino writes:
>> Are you at least clear on the reasons we don't want it,
>> even if you don't agree with those reasons?
>
> yes, i'm trying to understand your concern, and if i put your shoes on
> me i can understand why you don't want it (or why you want the cycle be
> as longest as possible). but still i don't agree with your reasoning
> behind your shoes.
>
Thank you, Itojun. In the end we may have to agree to disagree,
but I think we have made progress.
yours sincerely,
--Jonathan