On Tue, Dec 16, 2003 at 09:19:54AM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> It would be really cool if you could resurrect this stuff.
	I'll see what I can do.

> As far as the "larger than 64K reads" thing goes, yah, it is kind of 
> annoying about any drive that uses the ATA command set has this 64K 
> limitation (I think it's hard-wired into the spec, right?)
	yep, although there is room for expansion.  (there are several more
bit available in the size field that are currently unused)

eric