> > Hey Greg,
> > 
> > I haven't heard much new on this front (if so I would have
> > updated the page)... there seems to be some resistence among
> > certain NetBSD developers against it.
> 
> Not against pf itself, but the way it interfaces with altq and ipsec.
> We want to be able to use others packet classifiers than pf for theses.
> 
> The ball is at the KAME peoples, I think they still need some changes to
> altq to get done.

	correct.  we need some kernel-internal mods to altq before PF goes in.
	on my system PF is running just fine.

itojun