Subject: Re: bpf/pcap performance
To: Darren Reed <darrenr@reed.wattle.id.au>
From: None <ragge@ludd.luth.se>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/08/2004 10:40:54
> In some email I received from ragge@ludd.luth.se, sie wrote:
> > >
> > > Does anyone know why using bpf/pcap would drop packets when running
> > > netbsd as opposed to freebsd ?
> > >
> > Be sure that you have increased bpf_bufsize to some reasonable value,
> > instead of the default. I have no problem capturing data at 1Gbit
> > speed using an 1MB buffer.
>
> Which card/driver is this with ? And what sort of PC ?
>
> We're using a 2.4GHz P4, 256MB RAM, RDRAM, etc.
>
I use Intel PRO/1000 (wm driver) on a Dell 2650 /w 2GHz CPU,
512MB PC2100 ram :-)
> Are you storing to disk or just capturing to RAM buffers and then
> throwing away ?
> (We're also saving to disk.)
>
I'm storing data. I noticed that I may loose packets when saving
to disk (when it comes to higher speeds) so I started sending the
tcpdump output to another machine for storing; e.g.
# tcpdump -ni wm0 -w - | ttcp -t 10.2
> Oh, there is one other angle I should mention:
>
> * the application is threaded, one thread uses select over all the
> NICs so it knows when to read data from BPF, the other writes to
> disk.
>
I've only used tcpdump, but make sure that your application reads in
everything that is in the buffer each time that thread is scheduled.
-- Ragge