So, last summer (Late May) there was some discussion about RFC 2385
support ("Protection of BGP Sessions via the TCP MD5 Signature") which
had been written but not committed due to lack of time on the part
of the developer(s) who had written it.  Is there someone I can buy a
beer or two to persuade to revisit this?  :)  It would be nice to
be able to continue to use NetBSD for BGP applications now that many
peers are demanding MD5 session authentication...

Yes, IPSec would be more appropriate, but since the 500lb gorilla
supports this way...

Thanks!
+j

-- 
Jeff Rizzo                                         http://boogers.sf.ca.us/~riz