Subject: Re: failure from bizarre NAT setup
To: Wolfgang S. Rupprecht <wolfgang@wsrcc.com>
From: Ignatios Souvatzis <is@netbsd.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 04/22/2004 19:02:41
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Thu, Apr 22, 2004 at 10:00:48AM -0700, Wolfgang S. Rupprecht wrote:
>=20
> Steven M. Bellovin writes:
> > I am running my own name server. And as I said, the problem is with=20
> > the bind() call in the applications; it's not an MTU problem.
>=20
> I just mentioned the MTU as another problem you might want to be aware
> of. I know that some of the hotels are using normal end-consumer
> solutions to get to the net.
What... you think some of them use a real router+real admin combination?
-is
--=20
seal your e-mail: http://www.gnupg.org/
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFAh/qxN4tiz3B8hB0RAgGkAKCldy+HU+1Buc4HyqlGHO+7a7450QCdHc2B
ntnJ7oT9Pj6iumR/zbokBQk=
=CNXb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--Y7xTucakfITjPcLV--