Subject: Re: FAST_IPsec policy refcnt: "refcount" or "TTL", but not both
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org, itojun@itojun.org, thorpej@wasabisystems.com>
From: Jonathan Stone <jonathan@dsg.stanford.edu>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/19/2004 14:34:38
In message <E1BQYPM-0003vO-00@smeg.dsg.stanford.edu>,
Jonathan Stone writes:
Darn. Ignore me, EMORECOFFEE. Right after sending, I realized the
code is correct as it stands. In a for() loop, continue transfers to
the increment step, not the condition.
The reason I hit it in fast_ipsec is completely different.
I'd still like to clean up that code, to avoid misunderstanding,
but its not at all necessary.