Subject: Re: FYI: RST-ACK patent
To: None <mouse@Rodents.Montreal.QC.CA>
From: Jun-ichiro itojun Hagino <itojun@itojun.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 05/26/2004 16:18:12
> > For open-source entities, it's problematic, because we now have to
> > choose to EITHER, NOT apply an IETF recommended change, OR encumber
> > our sources.
or find other way to fix it - a fix different from i-d, and does
not step onto what patent says.
once the patent is approved (i hope not), the patent text will become
publically available. then we should change our code to be
different from what i-d says.
itojun