tech-net: Re: Alternative approach for interface events

Subject: Re: Alternative approach for interface events
To: None <tech-net@NetBSD.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-net
Date: 09/19/2004 20:42:20

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Sep 19, 2004 at 12:31:56PM +0200, Peter Postma wrote:
> I'm not really happy with the changes to pfil(9) to support interface
> events (attach, detach, addresses).=20

Doesn't the routing socket already advertise these kinds of changes?

--
Dan.

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFBTWKMEAVxvV4N66cRAulaAJsFyNuj+uBvwi2jluD/f7v1JGyGXACgqEGs
2k6sKAqnHDVFtZRBfw4huS0=
=ugNz
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--/Uq4LBwYP4y1W6pO--