On Sat, Dec 04, 2004 at 10:02:59AM -0800, Jason Thorpe wrote:
> 
> On Dec 4, 2004, at 9:38 AM, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> 
> >>Places where this would be useful:
> >>
> >>if_loop: return EPERM when trying to destroy lo0.
> >>if_sl/if_strip (not cloning yet): return EBUSY when device is open.
> >>if_tun: return EBUSY when device is open (maybe..? reduces lot of 
> >>complexity).
> >>
> >>Are there any objections to making this change?
> >
> >No objections, sounds right to me.
> 
> I agree it's good.  But this and the lo0 change require a kernel 
> version bump.
> 

Ok, then I'll commit it right now and bump the kernel version.

Thanks for the feedback!

-- 
Peter Postma