Subject: smbfs vs ipsec ?
To: None <tech-net@netbsd.org>
From: Daniel Carosone <dan@geek.com.au>
List: tech-net
Date: 12/14/2004 10:57:10
--ef8eQmdvO1j1gFMO
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
I have an ipsec SA established with a w2k machine, and I can ping and
establish generic tcp connections across it fine.
I then tried to do an mount_smbfs of a share from that machine, and I
get the following error after being prompted for the passwd:
mount_smbfs: unable to open connection
mount_smbfs: mount error for /mnt: Socket is not connected
I've previously (a couple of days ago) had smbfs working fine with
this same machine, before ipsec was in use.
Any ideas what's wrong?
--
Dan.
--ef8eQmdvO1j1gFMO
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFBvixWEAVxvV4N66cRAhOCAJ9dLWfiHn5ekskMrX1O+MSGfB03FgCfVJv9
c3FHUAgTP69CJ32hdNA3j7g=
=ngAi
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ef8eQmdvO1j1gFMO--