--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Sun, Mar 20, 2005 at 11:53:56AM -0500, Christos Zoulas wrote:
> Are there other nodes under net.inet.tcp.sack? If the enable node is the
> only one, I'd say no, because there is no prior art in naming booleans
> have an enable child. If there are other nodes, I'd say yes.

Yep.  The new code will add a few more sack related sysctls, tunables for
the maximum number of holes per connection and per system.  It felt a bit
silly to have multiple sack_foo sysctls dangling off of net.inet.tcp

--=20
Kentaro A. Kurahone
SIGUSR1 Research and Development

--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
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=zdRj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--uAKRQypu60I7Lcqm--