--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

On Mon, Mar 21, 2005 at 09:41:35PM +0000, Rui Paulo wrote:
[snip]
> > After a quick peek at the bug and the 1.213 diff, I think that the time=
stamp
> > related changes did address the problem here, specifically the "1)" por=
tion.
> >
> > If we are going to pull up, I'd recomend only pulling up that part of t=
he
> > diff[0].
>=20
> You're are correct, the cvs log is the following:
> http://mail-index.netbsd.org/source-changes/2005/01/26/0027.html
>=20
> Sorry for the lack of clearance in the previous message.

No worries.  Are you currently able to reproduce this issue?
If so, can you verify that the following diff fixes it[0]?

Diff: http://www.sigusr1.org/~kurahone/dump/netbsd-22551.diff

Thanks,

--=20
Kentaro A. Kurahone
SIGUSR1 Research and Development

[0]: It's a trimmed down version of the 1.2.13 changes.

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (FreeBSD)
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=m23P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--W/nzBZO5zC0uMSeA--