On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 20:35:32 +0200, Pelle Johansson wrote:

> >WHAT!  who is asking you for IPv6 NAT?
> 
> I think the most obvious reasons would be transitions between IPv6 and 
> IPv4, in both directions.
> This would be needed to completely get rid of an IPv4 internal network 
> but still provide connectivity to IPv4 sites.

Check out:
http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ietf-v6ops-natpt-to-exprmntl-00.txt

Running dual stack is the kiss and generally considered preferred way.

	rvdp