tech-net: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?

Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
From: iMil <imil@home.imil.net>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/24/2005 22:32:35

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1


> Why not port ural/ral from NetBSD-current to NetBSD 3.0 ? That's much more
> easier and I can give it a try if anyone is willing to do some testing.
> I don't have any ral/ural cards/dongles.

it's settled then, i'll bring you full backport for ural/ral really soon, 
as i said the work is 99% done.

- -------------------------
iMil <imil@home.imil.net>                                                 _
      http://gcu-squad.org                          ASCII ribbon campaign ( )
                                                     - against HTML email  X
                                                                 & vCards / \
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)

iD8DBQFDDNlmFG3BlGWyzUIRAuYIAJ4vLju70gmZOgNqHDZmRAfyVD/qFQCeOvsK
oQZWGndS7vvlWhoIbBa5qKg=
=o/49
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----