Subject: Re: ral(4) / ural(4) in NetBSD 2.1 or 3.0 ?
To: iMil <imil@home.imil.net>
From: Rui Paulo <rpaulo@NetBSD.org>
List: tech-net
Date: 08/24/2005 22:28:07
--z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On 2005.08.24 22:32:35 +0000, iMil wrote:
| -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
| Hash: SHA1
|=20
|=20
| >Why not port ural/ral from NetBSD-current to NetBSD 3.0 ? That's much mo=
re
| >easier and I can give it a try if anyone is willing to do some testing.
| >I don't have any ral/ural cards/dongles.
|=20
| it's settled then, i'll bring you full backport for ural/ral really soon,=
=20
| as i said the work is 99% done.
You don't need to bring me a backport, I guess I can do it myself. I just
wanted someone to test it.
-- Rui Paulo
--z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (NetBSD)
iD8DBQFDDOZnZPqyxs9FH4QRAsh5AJ9+W2+FNyblD5f0q83tOLPDdvcTEgCeLdxZ
hmCaqcy9gPYHfx5Nr7ReX5U=
=0d03
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--z+pzSjdB7cqptWpS--